Saturday, June 6, 2009

Obesity at its Finest




What if you were too big to fit through a doorway? How would you feel if everywhere you went, you knew that people were staring at you and cracking jokes at your expense? Is it because of a disease or something you can control? Obesity has now become a medical condition in which excess body fat has gathered to the extent that it may reduce life expectancy. You are considered to be obese if you are so overweight that it endangers your health. Obesity is linked to many diseases like heart disease, breathing difficulties during sleep, certain types of cancer and osteoarthritis. The question is, do these problems cause obesity? Or do they come from obesity?
The main treatment for obesity is dieting and physical exercise. Severe cases, surgery is done to reduce stomach volume and/or bowel length. Obesity is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide, and with the dramatic increase, it is viewed as one of the most serious public health problems of the 21st century. Although being obese was viewed as wealthy and happy in history, it is now a symbol of laziness and disgust.
So what has caused North America to become the heaviest continent in the world? Well, 1 out of 3 Americans are considered obese. There are fast food joints everywhere. We have become a culture that sits behind a screen all day. The average American man has a waist the size of 40 inches which is an increase of 5 inches compared to 40 years ago. The average American women have a waist of 37 inches which is an increase of 7 inches compared to 40 years ago. It is estimated that over 67% of the US adult population are overweight or obese. So with stats and a lifestyle like this, it’s inevitable that we aren’t the heaviest continent in the world.
By becoming obese, you increase the chances of the following:
Disease
Relative risk for women
Relative risk for men
Type 2 Diabetes
12.7
5.2
Hypertension
4.2
2.6
Myocardial infarction
3.2
1.5
Cancer of colon
2.7
3.0
Angina Pectoris
1.8
1.8
Gall bladder disease
1.8
1.8
Ovarian cancer
1.7
N/A
Osteoarthritis
1.4
1.9
Stroke
1.3
1.3

Just because obesity runs in families, this does not mean that it is genetic and it certainly does not mean that it is impossible to do something about it. Families eat together. They develop a common attitude towards food. The diet may be high in fat. Large, high calorie meals may be normal and everyone is expected to clear the plate. In some families the provision of sweets and cakes is an index of love. Being at risk of obesity does not make obesity inevitable. It means that the individual has to work harder to maintain an acceptable weight. Obesity is multi-factorial.
The sad thing is that 18% of children today are obese. This means that out of 1000 children, 180 of them are obese. That is a scary statistic to me. It is important to teach kids to eat healthy when they are young so they can carry those skills throughout their life. 70% of children who are obese will remain obese their entire life. Children become more at risk for disease’s and a very unhealthy lifestyle. Adult obesity has been linked to childhood obesity. It all comes back to the starting point.
Obesity is a rapid growing problem and but it doesn’t have to stay that way. No matter how much excess weight or fat you have, if you want to lose weight permanently, your diet program should be directed toward a slow, steady weight loss. According to official government dietary guidelines, unless your doctor feels your particular health condition would benefit from more rapid weight loss, you should expect to lose no more than 2 pounds of fat a week, although initial loss (mainly water) may be greater. Losing more weight is no guarantee that weight loss is likely to be permanent. Don´t be afraid to admit that you are less than perfect. It is this fragile thread that binds us together.


Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al; Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000.; JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1723-7. [abstract]
Haslam D, Sattar N, Lean M; ABC of obesity. Obesity--time to wake up. BMJ. 2006 Sep 23;333(7569):640-2.

Saturday, May 23, 2009

A Day Spent in the Media




“Hey guys, I want you to cheer as if you’re having the best time of your life whenever you see me clapping!”
“Just laugh as if I told the world’s funniest joke”


These were just some of the things that we had to fake to make a haircut seem as if Kanye West has just come to Toronto. It’s amazing how they have the power to make anything look interesting. They lied to us, they manipulated us, and my bum still hurts from sitting on those uncomfortable wooden boxes for two hours. Put on a fake smile, just do what they tell you to do and don’t ask questions. You can see that there really isn’t much to it to make a show look interesting. The set was small, cramped and very hot since there were so many bodies in that one tiny area. It’s disappointing when Leah came over and sat next to us and she wasn’t as great as we thought she would be. Not even half as great. She constantly swore around us, wrinkles on her face, and she wanted to get a razor for Keegans head but really needed it for her arms.





During the show, one of the people behind the cameras would come up to Leah during commercials and tell her to say that Keegan should be cutting it short since that’s how Canada voted but he chickened out. All he did was get a little trim and some emo bangs. It’s pretty sad how a haircut was the main highlight of their show. The only thing that kept me entertained was the faces my friends and I made at each other and at the show’s hosts. It was pretty cool how they only needed one camera to film the whole show and us learning how the camera works earlier in the day made it easier to understand.



The national film board has a pretty cool workshop where we got to make our very own stop motion animation. It was interesting to learn how a video is just thousands upon thousands of images in a row to get the feeling that it’s moving. They showed us many videos that were interesting and very open to interpretation. It is like how they say that a picture is worth a thousand words, stop motion animation is worth a billion words.


It is hard to believe how much work has to go into stop motion animation and just makes you appreciate the work even more. We made about a 10 second clip that took us about 20 minutes to film and about an hour to make the parts. Tim Burton spent 6 years making that movie and makes me wonder how he did not go insane. We had to find the image, exaggerate the image, and capture the image to be successful in stop motion animation. I think it would be an interesting career profession to pursue or even just as a hobby. It really makes a difference in your own knowledge when you take the time to appreciate the small things in life.

Friday, May 22, 2009

The Price to "Free" Speech


Entertainers should just entertain and give the people what they want. If they wish to express and stand up for their opinions then they should run for office and become a politician. Where does freedom of speech and equality come in then? Is “free speech” even the correct terminology? Is there a price to pay for “free speech”? Yes. Whatever you say or do will have positive or negative repercussions. Media loves to spin things more negatively/positively then the facts actually are which makes it more entertaining to watch.
Natalie Maines comment on how she was “ashamed that the president of the United States was from Texas” stirred more controversy because she said this while the president was very popular. Also, their home state (Texas) is a very conservative state that follows many old school traditions. Although the North American society claims that women are equal and treated the same as men, this does not shine through to its full potential. Women are still not treated equally and are still degraded in many ways.
How come when it comes to the issue of race, society frowns upon it and shoves it under the carpet? A statement about being ashamed about the president ruined the careers and reputation of three young women while a comment about the president not liking black people made society barely flinch. We live in a society where racism is not supposed to exist but unfortunately it does exist and it is not limited to one race. Racism is colour-blind and can apply to anybody. We are so afraid and sensitive to racism to the point where we are afraid to discuss it and act like it’s not there.





These were just some of the ways that the celebrities of our era decided to retaliate and protest. Musicians as early as the 50’s used their talent to protest against things they did not believe in but the 60’s was where the true passion of anti-war feelings came in.
This time era was during the Vietnam War which caused a lot of protest chants and songs to come out against the war. The main chant that was used a protest rallies was: “And its 1 2 3, what are we fighting for? Don’t ask me I don’t give a damn! Next stop is Viet Nam. And its 5 6 7 so open up them pearly gates. There aint no time to wonder why. Whoopee! We’re all gonna die.” Since the Vietnam War had soldiers who had enlisted and some that were drafted. This groups main protest chant was “Hell No! We won’t Go”. There were over 23 protest songs against the war during this era. Generations like these have changed and influence our society today to how it has become.

We still live in a society where men can say on live television, “The Chicks deserve to be slapped around” or “They are the Dixie twits. These are the dumbest. Dumbest bimbos with due respect, I have ever seen”. These statements are degrading towards women but were said on live news shows. With men like these in the media influencing the public, how can there ever be equality? Comments like these make it seem okay and natural in society. It makes women like Rihanna have to make tough decisions because of public influence even though her mind and heart may be telling her something else.
We discussed earlier in the year that celebrities have the responsibility to be positive role models and that they need to act certain ways in the eye of the public. Should women like Rihanna handle the Chris Brown situation how the public wants her too? Or should she be allowed to make her own decisions and still be a positive role model? We have seen the photos of the outcome of her beating but how can we be 100% sure they were not altered? There are many cases where the news media alters photos to create a more drastic and stronger feeling towards one side thus making the news biased.
People will believe almost anything they see out of that 52 inch screen. We looked at many pictures that have been manipulated. We watched many news stations that are actually entertaining stations. They take entertainment and turn it into fact less news just to fill in time and keep their viewers entertained. They are using charisma to attract viewers but losing their integrity to keep people.
Many journalists and news/media personalities have the power to persuade the audience and even manage to convince people of a total lie. The government used the media to help gain support for the War in Iraq. Fox news even managed to convince the whole country that Bush had won Florida State in the 2000 elections which is greatly believed to be the cause of Al Gore’s defeat. They have the power to make you believe that the Dixie Chicks are women who deserve to be slapped around and hate them to the point you want to kill them. So if journalists and news/media personalities have the power to do this, then shouldn’t that power be restricted? Also, should monopolies of news stations be allowed? Conservative men like Rupert Murdoch control over 9 broadcasting channels, 3 production/distribution film companies, 2 major internet companies, 8 sports related ownerships, 6 publishing companies, 3 magazine companies and 8 newspaper companies. This type of monopoly leaves room for only one viewpoint to be shown and always shows a biased viewpoint of the news.
In conclusion, The Dixie Chicks received harsh critism because they made their statement at the wrong time. Personalities of the news/entertainment should not be given so much power and should not have such biased viewpoints. Kanye West’s statement touched on a sensitive topic which no one was ready to discuss or listen too. There are many artists from every era that have protest songs and are usually about war. Freedom of speech does not exist because there will always be certain limits and you cannot say everything you truly wish too. There will always be repercussions and you must be able to deal with the consequences.

Brownielocks and the 3 bears. War Protest Songs of the 60's (sixties) Vietnam. 30 Dec. 2008. 23 May 2009 .

Friday, May 1, 2009



Diversity is important because it’s something that affects everyone. It’s more than just gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation or racial classification. It involves every single aspect of each individual, culture, and background. So as the years go by and our society becomes more diverse, how come our entertainment doesn’t? It seems like we are backtracking and changing what reality really is to what producers want it to be. It’s disappointing to see that TV is still lacking diversity but good that progress is being made. In our recent class study we found that some races are being greatly over represented or greatly under represented. Referring to the “TV’s Great Black Hope” article, we found:

Race/TV Percentage/US Population/Over-Under Representation
White/74.72%/66.2%/+8.52%
African American/13.92%/12.9%/+1.02%
Latinos-Hispanic/6.38%/15.2%/-8.82%
Asian/4.5%/4.5%/=0.00%
American Indian/0.42%/1.00%/-0.58%

As you can see there are still some big differences for racial representation on TV. “White” is being greatly over represented while Latinos/Hispanic is being greatly under represented. What we are seeing on TV does not match the reality we live in. There are improvements being made with 3/5 races being within a 1% difference gap of zero but how long will it take till all 5 races reach that gap? There is still a lack of diversity and the statistics of the shows do not match what society really looks like. Even in our own personal findings for anime sitcom we found that racial representation was unequal. Compared to the 2007 US census we found that every group was under represented except for Caucasian.

We watched many popular anime sitcoms like Family Guy, The Simpsons, South Park, American Dad, and King of the Hill and each one was still pretty “White”. We first need to get equal representation on TV so we can get rid of the “if” factor. Which means is each racial group even represented in the first place? Once we establish that then we can move onto the “how” factor. How is each culture, individual, race, gender, or age being represented? Are they being shown negatively or positively?
Also in our own study, we found that certain racial groups were represented more negatively then others. We found that certain races would always play certain roles on TV. Latinos and Blacks would usually play a criminal part while a Caucasian would play everything else. There are many other stereotypes in TV, even involving gender. Many women on TV would be seen be seen as the traditional homemaker while the man would support the family with income. This is what our ground found for racial roles:


In the media we have been influenced to think that all Arabs are terrorists who want to spread fear and see America burn. What about Aboriginal People who are always portrayed as criminals, violent, rapists, deceptive, lower intellect, or as passive and full of childlike obedience? It doesn’t help that Hollywood is always backing up Washington’s policies. The media only portrays half the side of the story and are very careful to choose the words they use like “evil”, “dangerous”, “savage”, etc which always gives a negative connotation. There is still too many stereotypes and discrimination on TV. Many ethnic groups are still not fairly represented and even misrepresented. Obviously when someone else is painting the picture about you in a negative way you are going to feel bitter and angry. You feel cheated and wonder how can you fix this? Is this how others view me as?
North America is mostly influenced by the media and believes that what they see on TV is real life. We get confused between reality and reelity. It’s time to start creating equality on TV so that all races can relate to the TV shows.
According to Fall Colors, they found that prime time diversity increases as evening progresses, with the 8:00 hour being the least racially diverse, and the 10:00 hour being the most racially diverse. This shows that they put the more racially diverse shows late at night because no one is watching. Some things that producers can do are to just simply make TV shows more diverse. Give a different racial person a primary role instead of secondary characters. Don’t go with the stereotypes that are already out there. Just simply put reality into TV shows. It matters because “more than 10 million children, on average, watch television from 8-9 o’clock in the evening? The “family hour,” as it has been called, is the most popular time for children to watch television, yet it remains the least diverse.” All of these children are growing up watching TV with no racial role model. That is why TV diversity matters.
We should not undermine our worth by comparing ourselves with others. It is because we are different that each of us is special. This is what we need to show on TV.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Oh Me So Asian!




There are many symbols you can do that may seem funny but are very offensive to others. This issue has come up when the picture of Cyrus stretching the corner of her eyes leaked onto the internet. She says it’s just a goofy picture but doesn’t realize the deeper cruel meaning behind it. It the symbol that was used as a racist gesture to insult my ancestors. Even my parents personally had this happened to them when they first came to Canada and when I really look back in life I remember that’s how I used to be bullied but it never really affected me that much. But what about young little girls who are impressionable and become victims of racial bullying? What will her little Asian girl fans think when they see that picture? Is it okay for people to do that? Is that how my eyes actually look? They will think negatively about themselves and start questioning their own race. The reason why it is a big deal is because she is a great influence on girls everywhere. She is their role model and what she does has a big factor on them. What if little white girls start doing that in front of little Asian girls at school? There can be some racial issues that will arise in society. It’s degrading and putting humanity back 50 years. China has taken a severe stand and banned Cyrus from entering the country, any broadcast of her TV show, films, and sales of merchandise. It’s a big step but it made me realize how many people out there find this offensive.

I know that racism is the key issue here but what about underage drinking? Do parents want their children to be influenced by that? It doesn’t take a genius to see that Cyrus could have been possibly intoxicated under the influence. You can see in the picture that one of the males is holding a glass of wine. It raises another issue and I wonder why no one has brought it up yet? She is promoting underage drinking and racism at the same time. How do parents feel when their little girl has seen the picture? Would they want someone like that as a role model for their children? I know that the picture is one of her private ones but as a celebrity she still has to act like a good role model, especially when the majority of her fans are little girls. All they are asking for is a legit apology and for her to learn her lesson. Say no to racism.

Vann, Tap. Miley Cyrus Asian Photo. 4 Feb. 2009. 26 Apr. 2009 .

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Beware of Recession



For those who don't know already, our beloved countries economy is rapidly deteriorating. We are currently stuck in a recession. You may find yourself eating out less and/or shopping less these days. With the prices fluctuating so much, it’s making everyone tighten up their belts. But what does our country going into a recession mean for us?
There are a lot of great things that are getting cheaper that teens love which are clothes and electronics for fashion. Cars are getting a lot cheaper which is perfect for our age group as we are starting to get our drivers licenses. We can go anywhere we want this summer since airfares are cheaper. There is always alternative energy that is getting cheaper to charge our electronics. Toys are drastically getting cheaper so it can entertain the kid in all of us. With all of these things getting cheaper, who wouldn’t want to be in a constant recession? Well, with the recession comes with the rise of food prices so if you have a goal to lose weight then now may be the perfect time. Also, with the recession here, we have to learn to take care of ourselves much better because even the price of medical care and prescription drugs are going up. As we are near graduating and deciding where we want to go for post-secondary education, a big factor that might affect our decisions is the tuition costs as they are drastically going up. As many of us are getting our drivers licenses and our own cars, we may need to think about what car we want to buy according to its gas tank. You may think the prices are expensive now but just wait a bit longer till prices sky rocket. The streets may start to fill up with garbage as the cost of getting your garbage collected has increased by 43% in the past decade, 24% in the past five years and that’s including the entire recycling program and other efforts at waste reduction. Also, as we are just two years shy of the drinking age, the prices have gone up 30% in the past decade so it’s going to cost our generation a lot more to have a drunken time. Being stuck in a recession makes a lot of families struggle and faces many hardships.
It also doesn’t help with the rise in the unemployment rate as Canada is now at 6.3% but will rise to 7.5% by 2010. Many economists like Doug Porter from BMO capital markets predict that Canada is headed into a worse recession than anyone expected, one that could last until 2010. Is it possible to say that we could be close to another Great Depression? Will it be another time of mass unemployment, starvation, and homelessness? It seems that it will be most unlikely that we will go that far. The major reason for the Great Depression in 1929 was because of there were excessive lending, and not enough money to back it up. Banks went into a cash crisis because they lent money to people who had a high risk of not paying it back. Now dazes a couple of banks have followed the same route but not enough to cause a stock market crash. Another thing was the constant reparations from Germany which caused a gradual loss of trading with Europe in general. There is nothing equivalent today. It can be a scary time but with the right planning and tactics we can come out of this on top.




CBC News. Canada to Be Hit by a Recession. 25 Nov. 2008. 19 Apr. 2009 http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/SaveMoney/7-things-getting-cheaper-7-that-are-not.aspx?Gt1=33009?slide-number=14.


CBC News. Canada Heading for Recession. 6 Oct. 2008. 19 Apr. 2009 http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/10/06/recession.html.


Melcher, Joan. 7 Things Getting Cheaper, 7 Things That Aren't. 10 Apr. 2009. 19 Apr. 2009 <http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/10/05/recession.html>.


Pym, Hugh. Are We Close to a Great Depression? 17 Apr. 2008. 19 Apr. 2009 .

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Not Just Another Band-aid Solution



Imagine you’re watching your favourite TV show and then the commercials come on. You see that same old white male who has a child sitting in his lap. He starts telling you about that little child and how he is constantly hungry, how his father was killed, how he is constantly living in fear, and how it seems completely hopeless but you can make a difference. Does this look familiar?





I’m not trying to bash on these Christian organizations, I admire them for their efforts and hope one day I am able to make a difference as well but what exactly is that difference they are making? Is it a permanent difference or just like we said in class a “band-aid solution”?



World Vision is an organization dedicated to working with children, families and communities to overcome poverty and injustice. This organization tries to give these poor countries access to clean water, food, medical assistance, clothing, and shelter. All the money you give to these organizations is used to make improvements that will help the entire community. It may be a “band-aid” but it is still making life easier and bearable for these people who live in poverty.



We may not be making a great impact on the country overall but we are making a great impact on each village one by one. We give them access to clean water, food, and an education so that they will eventually be able to survive on their own. We are implementing these small steps that will eventually make a big difference. They are thinking globally and acting locally to help make a change. It’s sad how more than half the world’s population survives on less than $2 a day. The society we live in has become a consumerism lifestyle that makes us believe that money is everything when really it isn’t and it takes the poorest of the poor to teach us that.
We discussed in class why Africa is poor and how it mostly comes down to the horrible and corrupt governments. So what makes the government so corrupt? Are they corrupt because they are desperately poor so they result to negative ways of earning money? Or are they simply corrupt because they are keeping their people in poverty? According to a 2002 study conducted by the African Union, corruption consumes more than a quarter of the continent's gross domestic product every year, about $148 billion. It is sad because there seems to be no solution that the world leaders can come up with to help Africa’s corruption, wars, everyday violence, and droughts. Also, the core of Africa’s failure is their leaders to provide an effective government but, it seems we can’t do anything about that. Maybe that’s why the only peaceful option we have to help them is through organizations that we see on TV who goes over to support the poor.
Another plan that could be possible is to start creating jobs in developing countries because without jobs then there will be no end to the poverty. To make this work, it would take the international community to all get involved and start investing in Africa. They need to fix its corrupt leaders so that no more money is wasted so that way Africa will finally be able to survive on its own. It would take a lot of money but with specific targets and effort, progress could be made. It’s time for a positive change that will make a big difference in the future. Just like the old saying goes “Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime”.





BBC News. Can Life Improve for the Worlds Poorest? 14 Sep. 2005. 15 Apr. 2009 .
Rice, Andrew. Why Is Africa Still Poor? 6 Oct. 2005. 15 Apr. 2009 .
World Vision. Imagine a Generation without AIDS.. 15 Apr. 2009 .

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The Canadian Girl Who Silence the United Nations

A 1992 video which is still relevant today (unfortunately).

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Live Your Life



Live Your Life


“Does Rihanna have a responsibility to girls to deal with her abuse in such a way as to make a statement against abusers?”


Rihanna, being a teen influence and role model to many young girls does have the responsibility to make a strong statement against abusers. By Rihanna going back to Chris Brown, she is telling all girls that it is normal to be abused by someone you are supposed to trust. As a victim of abuse, she has the responsibility to take a stand. Sure she is a girl and just an entertainer but she is in a position where many people are influenced by her decisions and look up to her as a “role model”. This pressure comes automatically when you are in the spotlight of the media.


There have been many crazy rumours about the Rihanna-Brown issue from Rihanna being pregnant to Brown proposing to her after a teary reconciliation. They even called a minister to the mansion they were staying at to get married on the spot and complete her fairy tale. There have also been rumours of Rihanna and Brown co-authoring a book together about domestic abuse or travelling from talk show to talk show talking about career rehabilitations. Another outrageous rumour is that they have made sex tapes and Rihanna is worried that they may leak onto the internet at any time. Majority of these rumours are false and have no credibility behind them. It shows that people love making up stories to gain attention and we the listeners will believe anything we see or hear without doing any of our own research behind it. People forget that these are all just rumours and speculation to help with our cravings of gossip. It is true that they have reconciled and are working things out.

The recent news is that the couple has decided to take a ‘’break’’ which may have more to do with the couple only wanting to continue their careers. They did reconcile and spend time together at Sean “Diddy” Combs house after the assault. With her reputation and maybe even her career on the line, staying away from Brown may be her best chance to win the public’s respect and affection. She threw it all away when she decided to go back to Brown, even though the public wished she would not have gone back. This break is a great opportunity for her to recuperate and reflect on her life, her career, and her relationship.


Many disagree with Rihannas’ choice because she is not taking a stance against abusers but I believe she is taking a stance of her own. Rihanna has been highly criticized for her decisions but I believe her undertone message for going back to Chris Brown is forgiveness and love. We live in a society where it is hard to forgive and forget and love is just as complicated and almost impossible. What does she gain from completely leaving Brown? After all of the time she has put into the relationship, it is nearly impossible to let something go that is so close to you. She chose to forgive instead of a grudge. She chose love over hate and as a powerful woman we must respect and understand her decisions. If you are a true fan then you would support her every move and decision she makes. She faced the criticism and stands by what she sang:
"When the sun shines,
We’ll shine together
Told you I'll be here forever
Said I'll always be a friend
Took an oath I'ma stick it out till the end
Now that it's raining more than ever
Know that we'll still have each other".

Actress Archives. Rihanna and Chris Brown Taking a 'Break'. 19 Mar. 2009. 28 Mar. 2009 .

Tucker, Ken. Oprah Winfrey: My Rihanna, Chris Brown Show 'a Huge, Teachable Moment'. 12 Mar. 2009. 28 Mar. 2009 .
Bartolomeo, Joey. Rihanna and Chris Brown Taking Time Apart. 19 Mar. 2009. 28 Mar. 2009 .
Star News. Rihanna and Chris' Secret Wedding. 4 Mar. 2009. 28 Mar. 2009 .

Carter, Shawn., Christopher Stewart, and Thaddis Harrel . Rihanna-Umbrella. 05 Oct. 2008. 28 Mar. 2009 .
Right Celebrity. Rihanna Herpes Rumour: Chris Brown STDs False. 14 Feb. 2009. 28 Mar. 2009 .
Dougherty, Robert. Chris Brown and Rihanna Marriage Rumors Spread. 09 Mar. 2009. 28 Mar. 2009
.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Just Google IT!



In the past couple of weeks there have been a couple of federal court decisions involving copyright challenges to Google’s search functions. The most important case was Perfect 10 vs. Google, where their images most likely constituted copyright infringement. Perfect 10 is an adult magazine company and operate a website. They make also make reduced-size copies of their copyrighted pictures to be downloaded onto phones. The issue was brought up against Google in two ways. When people use the Google image search engine to search for Perfect 10 models, thumbnail image’s of copyrighted photo’s show up. Also, when people clicked on that thumbnail image, a webpage with two frames appear. The upper smaller frame is hosted by Google and contains information about the picture. The lower frame shows the original web page but the image is not found there.
Perfect 10 is suing Google for copyright infringement and the display of these images through the frames. Perfect 10 says that by Google using those frames; it infringes its right to “display publicly” and “distribution” of their copyrighted images. The court found Google not guilty of copyright infringement on the lower frame because Google had not encouraged users to visit the third-party infringing websites. Google had no right or control over what was occurring on the third party websites. The court however did find Google guilty of copyright infringement on the thumbnails because they could for free be directly downloaded to cell phones which are the perfect size for cell phone screens.
The second case was between Field and Google. Blake Field is a Las Vegas lawyer who created fifty-one works and obtained copyrights for each work. When the pages containing Fields work in Google’s search results appeared, he filed a lawsuit against Google alleging direct copyright infringement. The court found that Field’s claims were not supported by the law and dismissed Field’s copyright claims. The court found that Google allows web sites to choose whether they want their site to show up on Google or not. Field was aware of this and intentionally choose not to use them.
I believe that Google will never be sued for copyright infringement because they are only providing the links for what the researcher is looking for. Google winning these past lawsuits sets historical precedence and this will help Google in the future win even more of any of these types of cases come up again. Google is just a search engine and nothing more. They help people locate sites and information that they want and lead them to the location. Google is a tool that benefits anyone who wishes to use it. It is very convenient and does not perform any copyright infringements. They are not copying anyone’s info or using it to benefit themselves. If Google were taking info from other peoples sites and claiming the info as their own then that would be copyright infringement. Google has never done this and all they are doing is just giving the seeker the site that they can find what they are looking for on. If you would like to find out more info about this case just remember: “Google it”.




Byer, David J., and Sarah T. Hogan. Intellectual Property Recent Copyright Cases Involving Google's Search Engine Clarify Digital Media Rights Online. Apr. 2006. 10 Mar. 2009 .

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Ooops She did IT again!

The greatest human emotional need is to feel appreciated and worthy. There are many ways for humans to achieve this in their daily lives. They gain these needs from their work and from stable relationships in their life. But what happens when a human being doesn’t feel needed or appreciated? What happens when emotions start to take over logic? What kind of emotions does Britney Spears feel whenever she goes out and is swarmed by paparazzi? What goes through her mind when she is doing outrageous stunts like buying a donkey and then driving around town with it in the back of her open car? Does she truly have a mental illness or does she just love to be in the spotlight too much?

Over the past couple of weeks, we have focused on Britney Spears’ lifestyle and analyzed her private life more than we wanted to know. As more research was conducted, a better thesis was developed; Britney Spears is an attention seeker. As her singing career slowly started disappearing and everything was settling down, she became “much more famous for things other than her singing career” (Spectacle). The first intriguing incident we heard of happened in 2004 when she married her childhood friend Jason Allen Alexander just “for the hell of it” (Judge). Five months later after her divorce, she announced that she was engaged to her back up dancer Kevin Federline after only knowing him for three months (Britney). A year later their first child was born and she joined a religion called Kabala with Madonna that was purely based on motherhood but quickly left it saying that “my baby is my religion” (Forget). As we’ve become less interested with her singing career, we’ve become more interested in her private life; Britney soon realizes this and plays the cat and mouse game, maybe just “for the hell of it”?

One of the first controversial photos we see of Britney is her kissing Madonna during a performance at the 2003 MTV awards (Kiss). The photo of her son sitting unrestrained on her lap while she is driving to get away from the paparazzi created a lot of chatter towards Britney’s parenting skills (defiant). The next photo is probably her most famous, which is of her shaving her head and then getting two tattoos.
After this incident, she checked herself into rehab for the second time in two weeks (Rehab). As the year 2007 arrived, Britney’s bizarre events started to escalate from her hitting paparazzi with an umbrella to her becoming an exhibitionist and showing the world what she’s got under there (Hit).

After everything Britney has been through, we still criticized her for her figure even though it was unfair. She had two kids, a divorce, and had checked into numerous psychiatric medical centers. The people and society should be criticised for finding entertainment in the sick or the weak. We take enjoyment from watching another human beings downfall and that say’s society is cruel and uncompassionate for those in need of help. I agree with the celebrities that are fighting back to protect their privacy. Celebrities are human beings and all human beings deserve equality and privacy rights. Celebrities should have to expect that their daily lives are newsworthy though to their fans who worship them. All of their fans are simply “star struck” and it is now a phenomenon that is bigger than life and this fascination with celebrities is a substitution for real life (New Age).
Paparazzi go too far when they are going at high speeds, willing to force stars off the road and are running red lights for a photo. They are willing to sit outside the celebrities houses 24/7 just for a photo and wear camouflage at night time so they won’t be seen. They are not putting just the celebrities’ lives in danger but also everyday citizens. When there is a safety risk involved with innocent civilians or anyone for that matter then that is already too far.
Britney Law- a 20-yard "safety bubble" around celebs considered to be "paparazzi targets."
What status do you need to require special legal protection that is only available to a limited amount of society? Britney Spears has met this status and the new Britney’s Law was proposed by Dennis Zine because of Britney’s psychiatric emergency, when her ambulance was swarmed by an army of paparazzi. Her ambulance had to be surrounded by policemen and helicopters just to get her to the hospital (Britney Law). Many celebrities would benefit from this law like Lindsay Lohan, Brangelina, and anyone else considered to be “paparazzi targets”. A-list celebrities like Lohan, Diaz, and Timberlake are joining together to turn the tables on the paparazzi (Push Harder). The worst incident caused by paparazzi was back in 1997, when Princess Diana died from a car accident as her driver was trying to get away from hounding paparazzi. Britney’s Law will help create some more freedom and more privacy for celebrities who are constantly being followed by paparazzi.
The media has finally lightened up and started praising Britney for recovering after everything she’s been through. They went through the years of what Britney did at the VMA awards from dancing with a snake to locking lips with Madonna. Fans are anticipating positively for what she’s going to bring this year and like Perez Hilton says “That's what people want; they want to see her smiling. Even if all she does is smile and wave, I say that's mission accomplished” (Official). After all, she has won over 157 awards ever since she came onto the scene and was an instant hit starting in 1999.

It’s weird how the media can create or destroy your image. You can become a celebrity over night like Kelly Clarkson but have it all taken away from you like Chris Brown. The paparazzi can be both positive and negative. It allows the fans to see what type of human beings they are idolizing which can show whether or not they are truly good people or show some of the skeletons in their closet. As long as there are fans in the world who worship these celebrities, there will always be hounding paparazzi that will do nearly anything for a unique photo. The best thing that any celebrity can do is just learn to be patient and learn how to become used to this constant heckling and chaos. This is the price of fame and anyone willing to seek it should be prepared to deal with whatever comes with it.


Cironneau, Lionel. Judge Dissolves Britneys' 'joke' Wedding. 06 Jan. 2004. 20 Feb. 2009 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3869708/.

CNN Entertainment. Britney Would Not Kiss Another Woman Besides Madonna. 4 Sep. 2004. 20 Feb. 2009 http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/03/britney.spears/.

Fox News Entertainment. Photographs Show Britney in Rehab. 21 Feb. 2007. 20 Feb. 2009 .

Halbfinger, David M. "As Paparazzi Push Harder, Stars Try to Push Back."

Splash News 8 June 2005. Rpt. in . Ed. Allison H. Weiner. Los Angeles: , 2008. 10-13.

Harlow, John. 'Britney Law' to Give Celebrities a Safety Bubble. 10 Feb. 2008. 20 Feb. 2009 http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article3341791.ece.

Hensher, Philip. "The Spectacle of Fame." Spectator . . Rpt. in . Hamilton: , . .
Holguin, Jaime. Britney Does It Again. 20 Sep. 2004. 20 Feb. 2009 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/23/entertainment/main645138.shtml.

Khoo, Adam. The Six Human Emotional Needs. 21 Dec. 2008. 20 Feb. 2009 http://www.adam-khoo.com/174/the-six-human-emotional-needs/%20.

L.A Life. The Hype Navel Maneuvers Britney Spears. 22 Nov. 2001. 20 Feb. 2009 .

Lagorio, Christine. A New Age of Celebrity Worship, Experts Dissect the Good, the Bad. and the Ugly of Being a Fan. 3 Mar. 2006. 20 Feb. 2009 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/03/health/webmd/main1366162.shtml.

Mcdonald, Duff. "The Britney Economy." 21 Jan. 2008. Rpt. in . : , 2008. .

The Washington Post. The 'Britney Law'- a Celebs Best Friend? 12 Feb. 2008. 20 Feb. 2009 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/celebritology/2008/02/the_britney_law_a_celebs_best.html.

Vena, Jocelyn., and Jem Aswad. Its Official! Britney Spears Will Appear at VMAs This Weekend. 8 Sep. 2008. 20 Feb. 2009 .Winton ,


Richard. Spears Charged with Hit-run. 22 Sep. 2007. 20 Feb. 2009 .

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Electronics in the Classroom

Today was just another classic example of how cellphones or ipods are not complete negatives to have in the classroom. We had a shortage of computers today and yet about 3 students were able to follow along and create their blog site on their phone or ipods.